ORIENTATIO:  GUIDELINES FOR WORLD RELIGIONS SHORT CRITICAL ANALYSIS PAPER #1

 

RS103 World Religions

Senior Associate Professor, Michael J. Landis, M.Div.

 

     Central to religious studies as such is the examination of a data set comprised of phenomena—subject matter—classifiable as religious, which results in understanding and synthesis:  a synthesis that entails both quantification and qualification of sui generis or idiosyncratic attributes (unique) and patterns of similarity (isomorphisms or isomorphic patterns) in apparently differemt or divergent data.  This examination should ideally involve non-reductive examinations and analyses of both the historically evidenced and contemporarily manifested phenomena that are associated with the interface between the interior psychological and the correlated exterior “product” domains of Homo religiosus.  The modes of analysis used in the service of such an investigation should be both diachronic (across cultures/geographical regions throughout the historical continuum) and synchronic (across the cultural and geographical range constitutive of the contemporary world).

     In terms of practical application of the abovementioned examination process, students will generate a short (2-3 pages…not including the “Works Cited” page) critical analysis paper, choosing an appropriate subject matter or topic encountered through the textbook reading assignments (i.e., from the “Introduction Overview”; “Chapter One: Characteristics of Basic Religions”; “Chapter Two:  Native American Religions”; or “Chapter Three: African Religions”); the class lectures; or the transpired in-class discussions.  Students will analyze a specific religious phenomenon or a cluster of phenomena (e.g., the ritual elements that constitute the Siouxian Sun Dance ceremony; or the persistence hunt in contemporary hunter-gatherer San culture), evidenced historically or manifested contemporarily; students will rely upon the written medium (i.e. the short composition itself as the result of the composing process) as a vehicle for facilitating this analysis and derivative synthesis (“to synthesize” means to draw hypotheses or make assertions that are functions of patterns of similarity or “common denominators” evidenced in the subject matter, and to exploit these hypotheses or assertions as modes of organizing the content of the composed critical analysis paper).  In the service of this analysis, students will research their subject matter, relying on at least three scholarly, college level electronic sources and traditional text sources (at least one traditional text—book or print journal—source, NOT INCLUDING the Hopfe and Woodward textbook is required), which will be included in a “Works Cited” page.  Students will invoke background assertions and hypotheses evidenced through the source material as well as insights correlated with their own critical thinking faculties to generate the paper.  Students may include direct quotations or paraphrased elements from their primary and/or secondary source material as means of demonstrating the soundness or cogency of their own derivative assertions or hypotheses.  Any directly quoted or paraphrased elements in student compositions should be cited properly, following MLA (Modern Language Association) guidelines/parameters for in-text citation.  The paper should be typed and double-spaced, adhering to MLA parameters on all levels.

     In terms of outcomes or objectives constitutive of this critical analysis writing assignment—outcomes that are correlated with the criteria upon which the papers will be assessed/evaluated—an effective paper is one that exhibits the following attributes:

·        A clear focus in terms of a defined subject matter:  an appropriate subject matter that can be treated through relatively in-depth analysis in the context of a composition of this length and scope (15 total points possible for this element)

·        A dominant assertion or hypothesis that is the result of analysis and synthesis—a thesis that governs the material included in the essay and provides a kind of logical framework for material included in the paper (15 total points possible for this element)

·        Development that is governed by the dominant hypothesis (the thesis) and that is bound by a clear pattern of organization or logic; this development should include full explanations of all hypotheses/assertions, replete with supporting quotations or paraphrased elements if relevant, as well as logical transitions between the sentences and paragraphs that constitute the whole composition (15 total points possible for this element)

·        Precision and accuracy in terms of assertions and explanations generated in the service of developing the subject matter (15 total points possible for this element)

·        Use of some of key vocabulary that constitutes the specialized lexicon of religious studies as such—the terms evidenced through the textbook readings, the class lectures, or through the primary and/or secondary source material (15 total points possible for this element)

·        Attention to the exigencies of intellectual property parameters in the forms of properly cited directly quoted or paraphrased material, through in-text citations, as well as properly cited entries in the “Works Cited” page.  Again, MLA guidelines are the normative guidelines for “proper” citation in relation to all submitted written compositions in this course. (10 total points possible for this element)

·        Syntheses that are non-reductive and that both quantify and qualify the sui generis attributes of the subject matter as well as the attributes that show similarities with other phenomena and demonstrate broader isomorphic patterns. For example, if a student is examining a subject matter from the domain of Traditional Native American Religion and she/he discovers a particular pattern of similarity between her/his chosen subject matter and something she/he noticed in relation to another subject matter, perhaps from another domain, such as African Traditional religion, the student should strive to draw her/his reader’s attention to this isomorphic pattern in the context of her/his paper.  (15 total points possible for this element)

 

 

Each paper will be worth 100 points towards the final grade in the course.  Ideally, students will become more proficient in the vocabulary and methods of religious studies through examining a specific subject matter in isolation and in relation to the entire range of phenomena attributed to and connected with Homo religiosus in multi-cultural as well as trans-historical/multi-cultural contexts.

 

 

Postscript:  Each student must clear with the instructor her/his choice of subject matter for this short paper in order to determine the appropriateness of the subject matter for a paper of this size and scope..